Imaam
ash-Shaafi’ee (767-820 CE)
Imaam
ash-Shaafi’ee, like his teacher Maalik, pointed out in
no
uncertain terms that it was not possible for anyone at that time
(The main collections of Hadeeth like that of al-Bukhaaree, Muslim and
(The main collections of Hadeeth like that of al-Bukhaaree, Muslim and
the
others belong to the latter half of the 9th century CE.)
to be
aware of all the Hadeeths which were narrated from the
Prophet
(s.w.) or to remember all Hadeeths which he had
encountered,
therefore, they were bound to make some wrong
judgements.
That meant that the only firm and reliable method,
which
could be utilized under all circumstances to decide what was
correct
and what was not, was the Sunnah of the Prophet (s.w.).
The Hadeeth scholar al-Haakim collected a statement of a
sh-Shaafi’ee in which he said, “There is no one among us who has
not had a Sunnah of Allaah’s Messenger (s.w.) elude him or have
one slip his mind; so no matter what rulings I have made
or fundamental principles I have proposed, there will be in
them things contrary to rulings of Allaah’s messenger (s.w.).
Therefore, the correct ruling is according to what
Allaah’s messenger (s.w.) said, and that is my ruling.”
The Hadeeth scholar al-Haakim collected a statement of a
sh-Shaafi’ee in which he said, “There is no one among us who has
not had a Sunnah of Allaah’s Messenger (s.w.) elude him or have
one slip his mind; so no matter what rulings I have made
or fundamental principles I have proposed, there will be in
them things contrary to rulings of Allaah’s messenger (s.w.).
Therefore, the correct ruling is according to what
Allaah’s messenger (s.w.) said, and that is my ruling.”
Ibn
‘Asaakir, Taareekh Dimishq al-Kabeer, (Damascus: Rawdah
ash- Shaam, 1911-1932), vol. 15, part 1, p.3.
ash- Shaam, 1911-1932), vol. 15, part 1, p.3.
The Imaam
also stressed a very important point concerning
personal
opinion versus the Sunnah. He said, “The Muslims (of my
time)
were of a unanimous opinion that one who comes across an
authentic
Sunnah of Allaah’s messenger (s.w.) is not allowed to
disregard
it in favor of someone else’s opinion.”
Ibn
al-Qayyim, I’laam al-Mooqi’een, (Beirut: Daar al-Jeel n.d.),
vol. 2,p. 361.
vol. 2,p. 361.
This point strikes at the
very heart of Taqleed which
has as one of its pillars the rejection of the Sunnah for
the opinion of the Madh-hab.
has as one of its pillars the rejection of the Sunnah for
the opinion of the Madh-hab.
Al-Haakim
also collected from Imaam ash-Shaafi’ee the
same
statement made by Imaam Abu Haneefah concerning the
relationship
between his Madh-hab and authentic Hadeeths, “If a
Hadeeth
is found to be Saheeh (authentic) it is my Madh-hab.”
Yahyaa
ibn Sharaf ad-Deen an-Nawawee, al-Majmoo’ (Cairo: Idaarah
at-Tabaa’ah
al-Muneerah, 1925), vol. 1, p. 63.
Such was
the uncompromising stand of this great Imaam who, while
in
Baghdad, wrote a book called al-Hujjah as a summary of his
Madh-hab,
only to turn around and write a new book called al-Umm,
representing
the new Madh-hab which he formed after journeying to
Egypt and
acquiring new knowledge from the Madh-hab of Imaam
al-Layth
ibn Sa’d.
No comments:
Post a Comment